Programming is a tool that can be used for a wide range of problems. Usually we code solutions for our clients, sometimes we build applications for ourselves. Programs don’t always need to be products at all, they can act as tiny pieces towards a larger objective.
It was back in May 2009 when Nico came with a simple question. How many triangles can you find in this figure?
Obviously 1-3-10, 1-2-7 are triangles. For sure 7-9-2 is easy to depict. 2-4-6 is a bit small but definitely one to count and so on. Each of these triangles has another mirror image. After a little while, you realise there is also 1-2-6, and 2-6-7 and –oh boy!– 1-2-9. Most likely you will have lost count of how many triangles there are unless you are seriously organized.
Since we like having fun, either with arcades, drinks or whatever challenge comes to our daily life in Manas, we decided to tackle down this problem using our favorite tools.
In May 2009, some of us were nearing graduation, teaching assistants at college; school was another daily activity.
Most of us are programmers, and as such, we program. But each programmer has different preferences, backgrounds, areas of expertise, and this simple exercise was a perfect manifestation of that richness.
During the whole day a bunch of emails were sent with the proposed answers. Claims were made around 53, 54, 47, 63, 65. 47 was the most popular answer by far, yet, incorrect according to some sources.
The difference between the numbers is based on whether or not three aligned points shall be considered a triangle. And if 2-6-8 is equal to 2-8-10... definitely not the important thing here.
So the result was that we had lots of implementations, with completely different “mathematical” backgrounds to solve this riddle.
In chronological order we had the following solutions
There were rounds of iteration along the day (we are agile developers after all) for fixing, discussing and discovering the different opinions around what is or isn’t a triangle. We relaxed the triangle criteria since we were not reaching the expected answer and we wanted to know why.
Adapting software is a big concern. If the inner functioning of the algorithm is not evident by reading the code, changing it is pretty hard. None of the above were too long or too cryptic, specially for the author himself. But, maybe because of my bias, Prolog was a clear winner here. Check the code!
But you know what? The solutions didn’t stop there.
Given that the input is fixed, the shortest program would be
echo 47 but that would have taken all the fun out of it.
And it’s nice to use your skills and the computer to solve a problem for yourself, by yourself. I happily remember when I already had lots of fun and challenges programming with nothing but a turtle .